February 15, 2010

Contents:

1. Stop GE Alfalfa!
2. Aquaculture expansion in BC frozen until December 2010
3. Going for the Olympic green medal

__________

Stop GE Alfalfa!

by Canadian Biotechnology Action Network

Take Action before March 3rd!
Protect Organic Food! Support Organic Farmers!

Organic food and farming in the US and Canada is under immediate threat. The US will approve Monsanto's genetically engineered (GE) alfalfa unless we stop them.

The US Department of Agriculture has released its draft Environmental Impact Statement on GE alfalfa and is accepting comments until end of day March 3, 2010.

They say:
-      Contamination of organic food from GE alfalfa will happen but it doesn't really matter.

-      Consumers don't care if organic food is contaminated with GE alfalfa.

-      GE alfalfa will result in fewer small farmers and fewer organic farmers but that's okay.

Tell the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) you DO care about organic food and organic farmers!

Organic farming bans the use of genetically engineered organisms. Stop Monsanto from destroying organic farming in the US and Canada!

Here's what you can do:

1. Send a letter. Canadian organic consumers can go to the following link to use a sample letter and to send their letter: http://www.cban.ca/Resources/Topics/GE-Crops-and-Foo...

2. We also invite all organizations, producer associations, companies and community groups to endorse the No to GE Alfalfa campaign by signing on the statement opposing GE alfalfa in Canada. Go here to sign on http://www.cban.ca/content/view/full/631

For more information, action ideas and background on this important issue go to: http://www.cban.ca/alfalfa

__________

Aquaculture expansion in BC frozen until December 2010

by Coastal Alliance for Aquaculture Reform

Canada's federal government was ordered by the BC Supreme Court to take over regulatory authority of finfish aquaculture from the provincial government on February 10, 2010.

Still in the process of preparing its regulatory framework, the federal government was granted an extension on this deadline to December 18, 2010. The court also ordered a freeze on all new farm approvals on licenses within this time frame. The Province then announced a moratorium on all new fish farm applications as well as a freeze on all new shellfish aquaculture licenses.

Although temporary, it is great news that for the next eleven months there is no threat of new open net-cage salmon farms increasing pressure on BC's environment. In particular, this stalls a proposal by Grieg Seafood for two massive new salmon farms - Gunner Point and Yorke Island - along a key Fraser sockeye migratory route in the Johnstone Strait. This location is already full of net-cage salmon farms and wild salmon can't afford to face another farm spreading disease, parasites and waste in this area.

In the meantime, send an e-fax to the federal and provincial governments asking them to take this opportunity to acknowledge the environmental threat of net-cage expansion, and to invest in closed containment technology to enable a viable salmon aquaculture industry in BC. Go to: http://farmedanddangerous.org/fax/stop_net-cage_expa...

__________

Going for the Olympic green medal

by David Suzuki with Faisal Moola

Several people have asked me if the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics will be the greenest games yet. The answer may be yes - if we're talking about the abundance of greenery and lack of snow brought on by record high temperatures during one of the earliest spring seasons the city has experienced.

With respect to environmental impact, all Olympic Games leave a very large footprint. Thousands of people flying in from all over the world, along with local transportation and the infrastructure that must be created, mean a lot of carbon emissions get spewed into the atmosphere.

What many people may not realize is that, along with sports, the Olympic movement has two other official "pillars": culture and the environment. People in Vancouver have seen evidence of the cultural pillar, with an amazing line-up of music, theatre, and other cultural events for the Cultural Olympiad.

Vancouver Olympic organizers have also tried to reduce the environmental impact of the 2010 Games. For example, venues and infrastructure have been built using energy-efficient technologies, clean-energy sources will be used for many aspects of the Games, and carbon offsets will balance out a significant portion of the emissions from the Games. As a result of these and other initiatives, the 2010 Olympics are expected to produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions than previous Winter Olympics.

But that doesn't mean the Vancouver Olympics are as green as they could be. In fact, we may eventually have to rethink our approach to such global mega-events if we are serious about reducing the impacts of climate change, particularly as the very future of winter Olympics depends on having winters cold enough to sustain snow and ice.

We hope that future host cities, and the IOC itself, will learn from the lessons of the 2010 Olympics. For example, despite an emphasis on public-transit use during the Games, the Vancouver Olympics will leave the region with few long-term improvements in sustainable transportation. Instead, the highway up to Whistler was widened at a cost of $600 million. And so far, 2010 Olympic organizers haven't made the most of opportunities to tell the story of their climate initiatives to Canadians and the world. Because so many people will be focused on the host city, and because climate change is a defining issue of our time, the winter Olympics offer an unparalleled opportunity to inspire billions of people around the world with solutions to global warming.

The IOC itself must also play a stronger role to ensure that Olympic organizers take the environment seriously. A look back at previous Olympics shows remarkably varied performances regarding the environment, with the Athens 2004 Games standing out in particular for their weak environmental record. The IOC should set minimum environmental benchmarks so that every organizing committee has clear targets to meet - or exceed. Such benchmarks would also allow successive Olympic Games to be assessed and compared and opportunities for improvement to be identified.

The IOC should also put in a place an external monitoring body for each host city to ensure that standards for addressing climate impacts are upheld. For example, the Commission for a Sustainable London 2012 was created to increase accountability of the London Olympic organizers with respect to their sustainability commitments.

And because not all host countries have the same financial means, the IOC could create an environmental fund, with financing from media-rights revenues or other sources. The fund could help less wealthy countries to incorporate environmental considerations into their games, and to invest in long-term environmental and social initiatives in their regions.

Of course, environmental initiatives around Olympic Games are a shared responsibility. For the Vancouver Games, the federal, provincial, and municipal governments, the organizing committee, and other organizations are all accountable when it comes to ensuring that the Games themselves are green and that they leave a lasting legacy for the region.

The Vancouver Olympics have demonstrated that climate change initiatives, such as green venues and clean energy, are not only doable but affordable and can leave lasting legacies for host cities. Future Olympics can and should raise the bar even higher by finding ways to reduce their climate impact and inspiring their worldwide audiences with climate solutions.

David Suzuki Foundation Olympics Scorecard:
http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Climate_Change/Projects/O... <http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Climate_Change/Projects/O...>

Calendar of Events

Media Watch